5-question survey · 2 min

We're building a tool that reviews
AI-generated code before it ships.

Your AI agent writes fast — but bugs still slip through. We're exploring a new approach: continuous code review during the agent's development process. We'd love your input.

Help us understand if this is a real problem worth solving.

01 / 05 20%

Question 01

How many hours per week do you spend reviewing or fixing AI-generated code?

Less than 1 hour 1–3 hours 3–5 hours 5–10 hours 10+ hours

Enter ↵ to continue

Question 02

How do you currently verify AI-generated code works correctly?

Manual testing AI built-in review (e.g. Claude /review) CI/CD pipeline Unit tests I mostly trust it Other

Question 03

What types of issues do you most commonly find in AI-generated code?

Missing functionality UI / layout bugs Logic errors Performance issues Security vulnerabilities Integration failures Other

Question 04

If a tool could continuously review your AI agent's code during development and catch bugs before merge — how interested would you be?

1

2

3

4

5

Not interestedVery interested

Question 05

How much would you pay per month for a tool like this?

$0 – $10 / month $10 – $20 / month $20 – $50 / month $50 – $200 / month

Thank you for your input!

Want to stay in the loop? Leave your email and join our Discord community.

Join our Discord

You're all set.

Thanks for helping us build something useful. We'll be in touch.

CodePulse · 2026